counter create hit

Why Kids Curse

March 27th, 2008

Kids, CurseNo one expects a 3-year-old who loves to dress like a princess to swear like a sailor.

But early exposure is not so uncommon. Who’s to blame? Well, there’s a pretty apt quote from a 1970 Pogo cartoon: “We have met the enemy, and he is us.”

The “us” are parents. A few weeks ago, I put a question out to hundreds of mothers on a local list-serv asking for anecdotes about the first time they heard their children use inappropriate words.

Many responses were similar to mom Julia Gordon of Silver Spring, Md. She was in her car, in a hurry and trying to park.

“The parking lot was crazy,” says Gordon, a lawyer and mother of a four-year-old daughter. When someone sped into a parking space she had been waiting for, Gordon said under her breath, “He totally screwed me.”

And a few minutes later, she heard her daughter parrot back the same phrase.

“I have to admit I did laugh at first,” says Gordon. “Then I immediately stopped and told her, ‘We don’t say that word!’”

The Worst Swear Word of All

Psychologists say it’s no surprise that children mimic words and phrases.

“That’s just language learning. These words have no special status as taboo words,” says Paul Bloom, Ph.D., of Yale University. “Learning they’re taboo words is a later step.”

Bloom explains that children are using words to communicate instinctively. They don’t yet have the judgment to take a step back and think about whether a word is appropriate for a given situation.

Bloom remembers one day when his son Max, then 6, came home from school.

Max asked in a hushed voice: “Dad, do you know what the worst swear word of all is?”

His son then went on to explain that “damn” must be the worst. When Bloom asked why, his son said, “I listen to my babysitter talk on the phone, and she uses the ‘f’ word, and the ’s’ word, but she never says ‘damn!’”

A study by the Parents Television Council found that about once an hour children watching popular children’s networks will hear mild curse words such as “stupid,” “loser” and “butt.” The scope and frequency can rise immeasurably with exposure to adult programs and popular music.

Lessons from the Playground

As an experiment with his children, Bloom and his wife tried their hand at creating their own family curse words.

“So one of them was ‘flep,’” says Bloom. Whenever someone would bang their foot or hurt their toe, they’d scream “flep” as if it were an obscenity.

The experiment was very short-lived.

“It was a total failure,” says Bloom. “The children looked at us as if we were crazy.”

The story gives one of Bloom’s mentors, Harvard psychologist Steven Pinker, a chuckle.

“Children are far more influenced by peers,” says Pinker. “That’s why kids of immigrants end up with the accent of their peer group rather than their parents.”

Particularly once they’ve entered elementary school.

When it comes to choosing words, our society has a bent toward novelty. Pinker explains we’re forever coming up with new ways to express that things are “good” or “bad.” He says there’s always a little “semantic inflation” going on.

For instance, if members of Generation X hear a song they like, they may say, “It’s awesome.” A teen of today may say, “It’s bitchin’.” If the song is lousy, they may say, “It sucks.”

“When I was a kid and you said something sucks,” says Pinker, “it was pretty clear what sexual act they were referring back to.” But today kids have no idea. The term is just part of their common language.

Perception Is Everything

Frequent use, over time, has stripped away the original connotation. Pinker says the evolution of “sucks” is similar to that of “jerk” or “sucker.”

“There is an assumption that ’sucks’ was a reference to oral sex,” explains Jesse Sheidlower, editor-at-large of the Oxford English Dictionary. Some scholars debate this, but Sheidlower says perception is what matters.

“Suck” may sound edgy or obnoxious to middle-aged ears, but parents may be at a loss to explain why it’s a bad word, especially to an 8- or 9-year-old. “It brings up a conversation you might not want to have right now,” says Sheidlower.

Not everyone’s on the same page about what constitutes offensive language. The boundaries of what’s acceptable vary from community to community and family to family.

Setting Boundaries

Some moms listen for attitude and intention in their children’s words. Chevy Chase, Md., resident Sarah Pekkanen is the mother of two boys, ages 6 and 8, and she has found her dividing line.

“I would be much quicker to jump on my kid for saying an unkind thing,” says Pekkanen, “even if he used perfect language to do so.”

Pekkanen says a borderline phrase like, “it sucks,” isn’t as offensive if it’s not intended to insult anyone.

A clear message about respect may be more fruitful than trying to police every word. By the time kids enter the teen world, swearing is almost a rite-of-passage.

“It’s hard sometimes,” says pediatrician Monika Walters. “As parents, you worry that they’re going to grow up and be vagrants or a menace to society.”

When parents like this come to see her or pull her aside after an office appointment, worried about vulgar words they spotted in their teens’ text messages, she asks them to remember how they talked when they were 15.

Walters says if offensive language is part of a pattern of aggressive behavior, there’s a problem. But in most cases, it’s just the way teens salt their language.

“Obscenity is a sure ticket to adulthood,” says Paul Bloom.

Or at least a way for teenagers to perceive that they sound older.

Bloom says he doesn’t want to control the words his children choose to use with their friends. “That’s part of growing up,” he says.

Another part of growing up is knowing how to speak with adults and in formal situations. “So we’d like our children to grow up knowing when it’s appropriate to use these words,” Bloom says.

As most parents come to recognize, teaching good judgment is not a one-time event; it’s a process.

Future stars of college hoops

March 27th, 2008

Future stars, of, college hoopsMcDonald’s All-Americans: East Team
SF Al-Farouq Aminu
HIGH SCHOOL: Norcross, Ga.
COLLEGE: Wake Forest
BUZZ: Having a huge season and aiming for a third straight state championship.
SG William Buford
HIGH SCHOOL: Toledo (Ohio) Libbey
COLLEGE: Ohio State
BUZZ: The McDonald’s All-American road continues for the Buckeyes.
PF Ed Davis
HIGH SCHOOL: Mechanicsville (Va.) Benedictine School
COLLEGE: North Carolina
BUZZ: Having as good of a senior season as any big man in the nation.
PG Tyreke Evans
HIGH SCHOOL: Aston (Pa.) American Christian
COLLEGE: undecided
BUZZ: Could lead the game in scoring. He is wired to put the ball in the hole.
PF Jamychal Green
HIGH SCHOOL: Montgomery (Ala.) St. Jude
COLLEGE: Alabama
BUZZ: The high-energy big man is one of the toughest players to defend inside.
SG Sylven Landesberg
HIGH SCHOOL: Queens (N.Y.) Holy Cross
COLLEGE: Viginia
BUZZ: A huge senior season helped push him into the game.
SG Mike Rosario
HIGH SCHOOL: Jersey City (N.J.) St. Anthony
COLLEGE: Rutgers
BUZZ: Has helped pilot St. Anthony to an undefeated high school record and No. 1 overall ranking.
PF Samardo Samuels
HIGH SCHOOL: Newark (NJ) St. Benedict’s Prep
COLLEGE: Louisville
BUZZ: Has shined in nearly every national event he has played in this season.
SF Chris Singleton
HIGH SCHOOL: Dunwoody, Ga.
COLLEGE: Florida State
BUZZ: Hoping to help his Dunwoody team win another state title down the home stretch.
PG Kemba Walker
HIGH SCHOOL: New York (N.Y.) Rice
COLLEGE: Connecticut
BUZZ: One of the top pure point guards in the nation and is the best setup man in this game.
SG Elliot Williams
HIGH SCHOOL: Memphis (Tenn.) St. George’s
COLLEGE: Duke
BUZZ: One of the most complete guards in the nation.
C Tyler Zeller
HIGH SCHOOL: Washington, Ind.
COLLEGE: North Carolina
BUZZ: Putting up ridiculous numbers in final year in the Hoosier State.
McDonald’s All-Americans: West Team
PF Luke Babbitt
HIGH SCHOOL: Reno (Nev.) Galena
COLLEGE: Nevada
BUZZ: First national accolade of many for future Nevada star.
SG Demar DeRozan
HIGH SCHOOL: Compton, Calif.
COLLEGE: USC
BUZZ: Players like DeRozan shine in the McDonald’s game. See J.R. Smith and Gerald Green.
PG Larry Drew
HIGH SCHOOL: Woodland Hills (Calif.) Taft
COLLEGE: North Carolina
BUZZ: Another North Carolina-bound All-American.
C Michael Dunigan
HIGH SCHOOL: Chicago (Ill.) Farragut
COLLEGE: Oregon
BUZZ: The gritty center should be a defensive force inside the paint in this game.
PG Jrue Holiday
HIGH SCHOOL: North Hollywood (Calif.) Campbell Hall
COLLEGE: UCLA
BUZZ: Having as good of a senior season as anyone in the nation this year.
SG Scotty Hopson
HIGH SCHOOL: Hopkinsville (Ky.) University Heights
COLLEGE: undecided
BUZZ: Along with Evans, he’ll be one of the few unsigned prospects in the game.
PG Brandon Jennings
HIGH SCHOOL: Mouth of Wilson (Va.) Oak Hill
COLLEGE: Arizona
BUZZ: Has been waiting for this big stage since the day he started high school.
SG Malcolm Lee
HIGH SCHOOL: Riverside (Calif.) J.W. North
COLLEGE: UCLA
BUZZ: Gets lost in the California shadow of Holiday and DeRozan but worthy of McDonald’s game.
PF Greg Monroe
HIGH SCHOOL: Harvey (La.) Helen Cox
COLLEGE: Georgetown
BUZZ: The big man really shined last summer playing with many of these same players.
C B.J. Mullens
HIGH SCHOOL: Canal Winchester, Ohio
COLLEGE: Ohio State
BUZZ: The best NBA big man prospect in the class of 2008.
PG Iman Shumpert
HIGH SCHOOL: Oak Park (Ill.) Oak Park River Forest
COLLEGE: Georgia Tech
BUZZ: Smooth, steady and full of star-power.
PG Willie Warren
HIGH SCHOOL: Fort Worth (Texas) North Crowley
COLLEGE: Oklahoma
BUZZ: Of all of the players in the game, he has the biggest chance for a wow moment.

The Easiest Diet Secret - Tips for easy dieting

March 27th, 2008

Easiest Diet Secret, Tips, easy dietingProduce, especially the veggie variety, is a dieter’s best friend. When people eat veggies with a meal, they consume a full 20 percent fewer calories overall — and still feel satisfied afterward, a study in The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition reveals.

I know that all that chopping and cooking feels like a drag, but it’s easier than you think to work in five cups of the fresh stuff a day.

At breakfast, have a fruit “smush” made with a medley of fresh berries and yogurt (the lean protein fills me up). Then, at lunch, have a great big salad with cucumbers, tomatoes, peppers, peas or whatever your favorite veggies are. Add grilled chicken or another lean protein to hold off afternoon hunger.

Start dinner with a veggie-packed soup, like minestrone, and make a side dish that you love (I’m a big fan of steamed spinach with a little salt). I also love ratatouille (especially in summer), but if you don’t have time for that, heat up some frozen veggies and sprinkle them with Parmesan or lemon juice for an easy, delicious, healthy side. My favorite brand of frozen veggies is from Cascadian Farm.

Or consider making a whole meal out of veggies! Check out these great vegetarian dishes from a recent issue of SELF. I guarantee that the eggplant cannelloni will be a hit at the dinner table tonight.

Cars That Pollute the Least

March 27th, 2008

Cars, Pollute, Least

What comes out of a car’s tailpipe is just as important as what goes into the fuel tank.

Fuel economy gets lots of play because of rising fuel costs, but exhaust emissions from motor vehicles have a huge impact on the planet and people’s health.

Internal combustion engines emit a host of harmful gases as a result of burning fossil fuels like gasoline, diesel, and ethanol. These highly toxic smog-forming emissions include carbon monoxide, formaldehyde, and other particulate matter that create the dark smoke seen billowing from diesel trucks and the gray haze hanging over large cities.

In addition to those pollutants, which are harmful to human health, vehicles also emit what the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency calls “greenhouse gases,” with carbon dioxide (CO2) being the main offender. Motor vehicles are the largest source of CO2 emissions, accounting for 51 percent of total emissions, according to the EPA.

Burning one gallon of gasoline emits 20 pounds of CO2.

CO2 and other greenhouse gases aren’t as immediately harmful to plants and animals, but scientists believe that they are causing global climate change as they collect in the earth’s atmosphere.

We have assembled a list of luxury and non-luxury vehicles that emit the fewest pollutants according to the EPA.

Hybrids fare well in both rankings. Three Lexus hybrids top our list of luxury vehicles that pollute the least.

But with hybrids often costing more than their conventional counterparts, is it worth it to shell out extra green to get a greener car?

At least 1,049 people think so.

That’s how many affluent motorists took delivery of the $104,000 Lexus LS 600h L sedan in 2007. This model is the most expensive hybrid available and ranks third on our list of the 10 least-polluting luxury vehicles, behind two other hybrid Lexus models, the GS 450h sedan and RX 400h SUV, which grab second and first place, respectively.

The large and ostentatious Lexus LS 600h L, with its potent V8 engine and electric-motor powertrain, certainly isn’t a poster child for eco-friendliness. Especially considering that it averages only 2 miles per gallon better than the conventionally powered LS 460, which gets an estimated 19 mpg overall.

“Lexus hybrid buyers are very interested in comparative fuel economy and emissions, but they are not willing to sacrifice performance or luxury,” says Greg Thome, Lexus’ communications administrator. “We’re appealing to a buyer that, in many cases, might not have seriously considered a hybrid in the past — we’re finding that LS 600h L buyers are cross shopping $100,000 models from Mercedes-Benz, BMW, and Audi.”

None of the competing sedans from other luxury automakers are currently offered as hybrids, but that’s about to change. Audi, BMW, Cadillac, Lexus, Mercedes-Benz, and Porsche have all announced plans to unveil hybrids, some as soon as 2009.

For now, though, Lexus is the only one offering luxury hybrids, and that’s why it took the top three spots in our list of luxury vehicles that pollute the least.

Looking at tailpipe emissions alone, hybrids have a clear and immediate advantage. The hybrid LS 600h L emits 70 percent fewer pollutants than the gasoline-only LS 460, and 90 percent fewer pollutants than similarly powered sedans from BMW and Mercedes-Benz, according to Lexus.

The main reason hybrids are so superior to conventional combustion engines when it comes to polluting is that a hybrid can automatically shut down their combustion engines in stop-and-go traffic when they’re at their least efficient and polluting the most. Some can even drive at low speeds using only battery power.

For those who shun hybrids, there are certain things to look for in conventionally powered vehicles that can dramatically reduce emissions — smaller, more efficient combustion engines, for one.

After the hybrids, cars with four- and five-cylinder engines come next on the list of luxury vehicles that pollute the least — cars like the Audi TT (fourth place), Volvo S40 (tied for seventh), and BMW 128i (tied for eighth) also made the cut.

Surprisingly, several sports cars — which tend to favor performance over efficiency — made the luxury-vehicle list, including the Porsche Boxster and Cayman in seventh place, the BMW Z4 3.0si, which tied for eighth place, and the Infiniti G37 Coupe, in tenth.

According to the J.D. Power and Associates 2007 Avoider Study, which surveyed why consumers favored certain vehicles, while gas mileage played a prominent role in vehicle purchasing decisions, wanting an environmentally friendly vehicle was one of the least-cited reasons for choosing a particular model.

But if the industry’s interest in eco-friendliness continues to grow, more and more models will likely be available as hybrids, and more consumers will be buying them. J.D. Power expects over 1 million hybrid vehicles to be sold in the U.S. by 2012. By then, there will be more than 80 hybrid models to choose from, according to Omotoso, from small cars to SUVs to pickup trucks, and everything in between.

“Environmental consciousness tends to come from wealthier, college educated people,” Omotoso says. “But as terms like ‘global warming,’ ‘dependence on foreign oil,’ and ‘carbon footprint’ become more common, more and more consumers at all income levels will factor in the environment in their vehicle purchase decision.”

You don’t have to pick the most-expensive hybrid or the smallest car on the lot to do your part. “Even marginal improvements in fuel economy can go a long way,” says Catherine Milbourn, press officer for the Environmental Protection Agency.

For instance, two visually identical cars that use the same engines can have different emissions outputs simply based on one model being all-wheel drive, and the other being rear-wheel drive. The rear-drive BMW 328i ties for eighth place on our list, with a Carbon Footprint of 8.3 annual tons of greenhouse gas emissions. The all-wheel-drive 328xi did not make out list because it gets worse fuel economy and emits 9.2 tons of greenhouse gases annually.

Milbourn suggests environmentally conscious consumers check the fuel economy and emissions ratings for all vehicles under consideration, as posted on the vehicle-related websites the agency maintains in conjunction with the Department of Energy: www.fueleconomy.gov, and www.epa.gov/greenvehicles.

Non-Luxury Vehicles

With luxury status out of the equation, hybrids still figure prominently when it comes to tailpipe emissions.

Small hybrid cars like the Toyota Prius and Honda Civic Hybrid rated the highest on the non-luxury list, but a few hybrid SUVs, like the Ford Escape Hybrid, which tied for fourth place, and Toyota Highlander Hybrid, in fifth, also placed well.

Volvo C30 T5
Volvo C30 T5
Hybrids are the top choice for low emissions today, but a few years from now, a similar ranking based on tailpipe emissions might turn up a list of all-electric vehicles.

That hypothetical list might contain the $98,000 Tesla Roadster, an all-electric sports car slated to go on sale this spring. Another potential contender is the Fisker Karma, an $80,000 four-door hybrid luxury sedan that can be plugged in and recharged, traveling up to 50 miles on emissions-free electric power.

But until those vehicles and others like them come out, choosing a hybrid is the easiest way to pollute the least.

About Our Rankings

Our two least-polluting lists, one for luxury vehicles and one for non-luxury vehicles, are based on examining each model’s Air Pollution Score and Carbon Footprint ratings as determined by the EPA.

The Air Pollution Score represents the amount of health-damaging and smog-forming airborne pollutants a vehicle emits. Among these are hydrocarbons, nitrogen oxide, particulate matter, carbon monoxide, and formaldehyde. Scoring is based on a 10-point scale, with 10 representing a zero-emissions vehicle, meaning higher numbers are better.

Carbon Footprint ratings estimate the tons of greenhouse gases each vehicle generates per year based on 15,000 miles of driving. These emissions include carbon dioxide, nitrous oxide, methane, and other compounds believed to be major contributors to global warming. One gallon of gasoline converts to 20 pounds of CO2 emitted into the atmosphere.

The EPA’s ratings cited in our lists assume emissions generated not just by burning fuel while driving, but from fuel production and refining as well. Scoring is expressed in the number of tons of greenhouse gases produced each year, meaning lower scores are better.

The EPA considers a vehicle’s Air Pollution Score to be more important because it is directly related to air quality, and thus has an immediate impact on human health. Therefore, we use it as the basis for our ranking. Carbon Footprint rating is included for every vehicle but was primarily used to break ties in our rankings.

It Gets Complicated

Many of the lowest-emission versions of some models aren’t available in all 50 states. Some specially certified “super low-emissions” (SULEV) or “partial-zero emissions” (PZEV) vehicles — which are rated at 9 and 9.5 on the Air Pollution scale, respectively — are offered only in California and the handful of other states that adhere to California’s stricter air-pollution standards. They include Arizona, Connecticut, Florida, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington.

However, there are instances when a manufacturer sells the same version of the car that qualifies as SULEV or ULEV in other states and doesn’t bother going through the bureaucracy of certifying it as such in the states that don’t require it. In those instances, we use the highest EPA emissions ratings, being that, more than likely, consumers can purchase the SULEV- or ULEV-equivalent version of the vehicle in the states that don’t require this rating.

But in instances where a SULEV or ULEV vehicle is only sold in California and the other states mentioned above that have adopted its emissions regulations, we use the lower emissions score.

The best way to tell if a vehicle is SULEV or ULEV compliant even though it isn’t rated as such in the state where you live is to check what the EPA calls the “Underhood ID” to see if it matches that of the variant that officially qualifies as SULEV or ULEV.

Go to the EPA’s site to read more about this topic.

Finally, to qualify for luxury status, a vehicle must be made by a company commonly regarded as a luxury or premium automotive manufacturer.

Big belly boosts risk of later dementia

March 27th, 2008

Big belly, boosts, risk, of, later dementiaNEW YORK - Having a big belly in your 40s can boost your risk of getting Alzheimer’s disease or other dementia decades later, a new study suggests.

It’s not just about your weight. While previous research has found evidence that obesity in middle age raises the chances of developing dementia later, the new work found a separate risk from storing a lot of fat in the abdomen. Even people who weren’t overweight were susceptible.

That abdominal fat, sometimes described as making people apple-shaped rather than pear-shaped, has already been linked to higher risk of developing diabetes, stroke and heart disease.

“Now we can add dementia to that,” said study author Rachel Whitmer of the Kaiser Permanente Division of Research in Oakland, Calif.

She and others report the findings in Wednesday’s online issue of the journal Neurology.

The study involved 6,583 men and women who were ages 40 to 45 when they had checkups between 1964 and 1973. As part of the exam, their belly size was measured by using a caliper to find the distance between their backs and the surface of their upper abdomens. For the study, a distance of about 10 inches or more was considered high.

The researchers checked medical records to see who had developed Alzheimer’s or another form of dementia by an average of 36 years later. At that point the participants were ages 73 to 87. There were 1,049 cases.

Analysis found that compared to people in the study with normal body weight and a low belly measurement:

• Participants with normal body weight and high belly measurements were 89 percent more likely to have dementia.

• Overweight people were 82 percent more likely if they had a low belly measurement, but more than twice as likely if they had a high belly measurement.

• Obese people were 81 percent more likely if they had a low belly measurement, but more than three times as likely if they had a high measurement.

Whitmer said there’s no precise way to translate belly measurements into waist circumference. But most people have a sense of whether they have a big belly, she said. And if they do, the new study suggests they should get rid of it, she said.

It’s not clear why abdominal fat would promote dementia, but it may pump out substances that harm the brain, she said.

Dr. Jose Luchsinger of the Columbia University Medical Center in New York, who studies the connection between obesity and Alzheimer’s disease but didn’t participate in the new work, cautioned that such a study cannot prove abdominal fat promotes dementia.

But the study results are “highly plausible” and “I’m not surprised at all,” he said. High insulin levels might help explain them, he said.

Dr. Samuel Gandy, who chairs the medical and scientific advisory council of the Alzheimer’s Association, said the results fit in with previous work that indicates a person’s characteristics in middle age can affect the risk of dementia in later life.

And it’s another example of how traits associated with the risk of developing heart disease are also linked to later dementia, he said.